Meta Ads Analyzer
Meta Placement Performance Analyzer
Turn a Meta Ads placement breakdown into a clearer view of where budget is going, which placements over- or under-index on results, and where creative fit or delivery quality deserves a closer look.
Upload a placement breakdown
Export the scope you want to review from Meta Ads Manager, then break the report down by placement before downloading the CSV.
Confirm the report columns
PaidMediaKit detects common Meta Ads column names automatically. Placement and spend are required; outcome metrics improve the analysis.
Set the review rules
Use blended account performance for a relative placement comparison, or compare placements against your own efficiency targets.
Placement Analysis
Where delivery is helping — and where to look closer
Facebook, Instagram and other publisher platforms
Spend share and result share are calculated within the uploaded report scope. Efficiency Index = Result Share ÷ Spend Share. Above 1.00 means the placement contributes a larger share of results than spend; below 1.00 means it contributes less.
How to use placement analysis
Placement reporting helps answer a different question from campaign-level reporting: not just whether the campaign performed, but where Meta actually delivered the budget across Feed, Stories, Reels, Messenger, Audience Network and other surfaces.
Useful for spotting concentration and understanding what Meta is prioritizing.
Compare it with spend share instead of judging a placement on raw results alone.
An index above 1.00 means result contribution is outpacing budget contribution.
Why a weak placement is not automatically an exclusion
Delivery is optimized across the inventory available to the campaign. A placement can look weaker in isolation because of audience mix, auction conditions, creative format, objective or limited sample size. Use the analyzer as a diagnostic starting point, then investigate the cause before narrowing placement availability.